Talk:Magnetic particle inspection
| WikiProject Engineering | (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Metalworking | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
I removed:
The flaw acts in the same way as a discontinuity in the path of the magnetic fluctuation caused to flow in the specimen in such a direction it crosses the main plane of the defect at right -angles, causing the flux to bend around the defect in an alternative direction in the material which surrounds it. This deformation of the flux is not limited to the immediate locality of the defect but extends, in a deteriorating degree, for a considerable distance around it, and out through the surface into thefix. RJFJR 05:09, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
Can someone clarify the differences between this method and magnetic flux leakage ?
--Lyncas 17:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Completely redid the article and will continue to work on it adding references.
--Justin and more pictures also will work on some other articles relating to this material. —Preceding undated comment added 15:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC).
[edit] Merger proposal
I suggest magnaflux be merged into magnetic particle inspection. The article on magnaflux is mostly a brief description of magnetic particle inspection. The part about magnaflux itself is a very short description of the company which specializes in several nondestructive testing techniques. I have already added this to the external links section of magnetic particle inspection. I don't know if there are suggestions for other specific parts of the magnaflux article which may qualify for merger? Druzhnik (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
