This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mariah Carey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mariah Carey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Does the merit mentioning? Several other shows have featured contestants playing for Make a Wish and lost as well. This seems more of an obscure trivia fact someone posted to feel important. Modor (talk) 18:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Modor
The History section has an awful lot about wrestling - two of the five paragraphs deal w/ wrestlers and wrestling-related wishes. Make-a-Wish doesn't specify that it specializes in any particular type of wish, so I don't see the relevance of focusing so heavily on this one particular sport. I'm going to delete it.Soojmagooj (talk) 16:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was moved. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Surely this comes within the rules at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks), which states:"Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official""Skinsmoke (talk) 01:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
To me, WP:CAPS takes precedence over the MOS. It says to keep a proper noun all caps, and that's what we're supposed to do in English regardless, so that's the basis of my opinion above.
— V = I * R (talk to Ω) 10:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
What about the rest of that quote? The full text is:-
Convention: For page titles, always use lowercase after the first word, and do not capitalize second and subsequent words, unless the title is a proper noun. For multiword page titles, one should leave the second and subsequent words in lowercase unless the title phrase is a proper noun that would always occur capitalized, even in the middle of a sentence.
This convention often also applies within the article body, as there is usually no good reason to use capitals. Outside of Wikipedia, and within certain specific fields (such as medicine), the usage of all-capital terms may be a proper way to feature new or important items. However these cases are typically examples of buzzwords, which by capitalization are (improperly) given featured status.
In general, each word in English titles of books, films, and other works takes an initial capital, except for articles ("a", "an", "the"), the word "to" as part of an infinitive, prepositions and coordinating conjunctions shorter than five letters (e.g., "on", "from", "and", "with"), unless they begin or end a title or subtitle. Examples:A New Kind of Science,Ghost in the Shell,To Be or Not to Be.
In my opinion, that quote from WP:CAPS makes the case in favor of changing the title, not against it. The first paragraph says (not once, but twice): "unless the title is a proper noun". Isn't the name of an organization considered a proper noun? The third paragraph mentions using lowercase for articles ("a", "an", etc.), but specifically states it applies to: "English titles of books, films, and other works". So how does that apply to the name of an organization? -- Zyxw (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment - Seeing an oppose based on Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) (MOS:TM), I looked at the quoted guideline and found the examples given use all capital letters ("avoid: REALTOR®, TIME, KISS"). Unfortunately, MOS:TM doesn't give any examples of a trademark containing an article such a "A". Other somewhat relevant guidelines include "Capitalize trademarks, as with proper names." and "Trademarks in CamelCase are a judgment call. CamelCase may be used where it reflects general usage and makes the trademark more readable: OxyContin or Oxycontin—editor's choice." In my opinion, the quote from MOS:TM which applies best in this case is "Use common sense in applying it; it will have occasional exceptions." -- Zyxw (talk) 08:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The first Canadian wish was granted in 1983. It was a wish for a girl named Debbie who wanted to visit her parents in Germany. She got to visit them in August 198+999.
Is that supposed to say 198+999 on the end? I have a feeling it's not, but since I have no idea what it's actually supposed to say, I'll leave it alone for now. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 20:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
There's been a UK Make-A-Wish Foundation for some time. Here's their website. Could someone who knows something about it (ie not me) please add some details? Also, it seems a bit misleading for the intro to specify only the USA, given that MAW now operates in (at least) three countries. Something like "originating in the USA" might be better, with the 501(c)(3) status - which obviously doesn't apply overseas - mentioned in a following sentence. Either that, or start a whole new article for the non-USA bits. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 15:21, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
As a major charity, this page needs more information on it! I'm adding some basic stuff, but it should be more than 1 page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The dinks 18 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
President of the United States Barack Obama meets a Make-a-Wish Foundation child in the Oval Office, June 2011.
John Cena having a tea party with a child from the Make-A-Wish Foundation
A user, Jasonkm, an editor with 6 edits, keeps changing the image in the article from the one with President Obama to the one with John Cena, both seen at right. I prefer the Obama one only because it's better quality, but I think both could be used in the article. I'm starting this discussion so we can come to a consensus. Discuss. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 14:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)