This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's History and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
A fact from Malinda Cramer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 22 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 545 times (disclaimer)(check views). The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
I have added references. This article will be expanded. Thanks, Madman (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
The correct thing to do is to provide references before edit-warring to restore it from redirect. Also of your three references, one is to an unreliable commercial blurb (of unknown authorship, accuracy and editorial oversight) and the remaining two are to sources within Divine Science. As such notability has not been established and I have templated the article accordingly. HrafnTalkStalk 14:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Enter the following information so that we may authenticate you.
If you are using your library ID barcode or other ID for remote access,
enter that information in the PASSWORD field.
Please see your librarian, teacher, or system administrator for your username and password. Username and password are case sensitive.
It is thus not publicly accessible. Combining these two drawbacks makes it absolutely useless for verification purposes. HrafnTalkStalk 15:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't revert your "concerns", just your deletions of properly source material. Gale Publishing is a reputable publishing company and much/most of the online material is also available in book form as well. The material that is referenced is not contentious, just simply dates and biographical facts. Please assume good faith. Thanks, Madman (talk) 04:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Madman2001: Get your facts straight! The edit that you reverted did not contain a deletion, as this dif of your reversion clearly demonstrates. I am not disputing that Gale Publishing is WP:RS, merely that your reference to them is unverifiable. After your stream of accusations of vandalism against me for merely following WP:V, your "Please assume good faith" is extremely WP:POT. HrafnTalkStalk 04:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Further on this, advice from Wikipedia talk:Verifiability raised concerns about the citation's specificity, but one of them suggested "a quick search of the given citation". When I did this, it turned up that this seems to be the standard way of citing Gale. This still strikes me as not being particularly informative, but given that it's the standard, objecting to it would be WP:POINT. HrafnTalkStalk 05:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone know what the "persistent health problem" was that Malinda Cramer suffered from that rendered her "an effective invalid"? In Divine Science and Healing, she does not disclose the exact nature of her illness either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 21:52, 30 September 2012 (UTC)