Talk:Manuel Roxas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Collaboration with Japanese[edit]

This article is in dire need of a section dealing with the question and circumstances of his collaboration with the Japanese and the Laurel puppet government, and with the controversy over MacArthur's decision to exonerate him. The matter of Roxas' arrest by American forces also needs to be more fully explained: Roxas was arrested along with the Chief Justice in the Laurel government and three other Laurel officials; MacArthur declined to intervene on behalf of the other four men despite the fact that they also had given token support to the guerillas. As Manchester points out, nearly all of the collaborators gave nominal assistance to the guerillas as a way of hedging their bets ("insurance," is the word Manchester uses). Whether one is sympathetic to Roxas or not, these are major issues that need to be explored, preferably in a separate section, in order to give a full and fair accounting of his life.-PassionoftheDamon (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you're right. However, content in the article must be verified on reliable sources. The section in question, regarding is political career, is cited to a reliable source (although not available online, not that reliable sources need to be available online). That being said this source might come in handy, it is a reliable source, and might give weight to your concern.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have to agree with both of you. This article is a whitewash of Roxas's wartime career, making it sound he was a resistance leader when he was in he was a Japanese collaborator. Gerhard Weinberg is rightly regarded as one of the leading historians of World War II and his book A World in Arms, which is definitely a reliable source, talks about Roxas as a Japanese collaborator and his knowledge of the rather peculiar gift that President Manuel L. Quezon gave General MacArthur in 1942, which explains why MacArthur intervened to help out after his arrest. If no one objects, I'll like to rewrite that section.--A.S. Brown (talk) 04:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Article[edit]

I'm new to Wikipedia, so I don't exactly know what the procedures are with regards to making claims of this kind. I feel that the article as it stands (28 Feb 2011) is very biased in favor of Roxas. Examples of unabashedly positive characterizations or unsubstantiated positive claims follow:

Early life and career: "...and subsequently topped the first bar examinations with a grade of 92%, becoming the first ever bar topnotcher of the Philippines." (Based on what source?)

Congressional Career/House of Reps/House Speakership: "The Roxas potential for national leadership became evident when he was elected President of the national league of governors during his term as provincial head." (Why does this need to be in here? It could simply be said that he was elected President of the national league of governors...)

Presidency/First President of the Third Republic: "...Philippine Independence from the United States proclaimed, amidts plaudits and prayers of some 300,000 people, 21-gun salute and joyous echoes of church bells." (Plaudits and prayers? Joyous echoes of church bells?)

Presidency/Domestic policies: "President Roxas, with bold steps, met the situation with the same confidence he exuded in his inaugural address..." (I feel like this is an advert or something.)

Presidency/Reconstruction after the war: "...the Hukbalahaps and brigands terrorized towns and barrios. (No matter your opinion of the Huks, characterizing them as having terrorized towns seems fairly one-sided, especially given Roxas' own heavy-handed crackdown on them.)

Presidency/Amnesty proclamation: He "granted full amnesty to all so-called Philippine collaborators..." and "The presidential decision did much to heal a standing wound that somehow threatened to divide the people's sentiments. It was a much-called for measure to bring about a closer unity in the trying times when such was most needed for the progress of the nation." (I feel like a broken record: this sounds like an advertisement for Manuel Roxas.)

Presidency/HUKS Outlawed: "Utterly disgusted with the crimes being committed," and "in possession of the incontrovertible evidence of the subversive character of [the Huks]," he "issued a Proclamation outlawing Huks' movement, making it a crime to belong to the same. The declaration was hailed by all responsible and peace-loving elements." (Once again, no matter what your personal opinion of the Huks, this is CLEARLY biased towards Roxas. All responsible and peace-loving elements?! This is supposed to be an encyclopedia...)

There's more, but that's the bulk of what I found. I have no special qualifications to make changes, besides being an interested student of Philippine history, but this seems outrageous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.195.27.224 (talk) 02:03, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a old thread, but the IP is right here. Much of the language in this article is clearly not neutral. The part about amnesty for those Filipinos who collaborated as being part of much needed national healing process really does stick out. And the IP is right here that the way this article presents all of the crimes during the Huk rebellion as being the work of the Huks is very highly problematic to say the least. This section really does need a rewrite. --A.S. Brown (talk) 03:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the President of the Philippines.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Flag of the President of the Philippines.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:34, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional new information re other offspring of President Roxas[edit]

    This information is about the three offspring of President Roxas who were born out of wedlock, namely, (a) Rosario "Charo" McIlvain Roxas, born September 5, 1927, married to Francis G. Moran (deceased); (b) Manuel "Manny" McIlvain Roxas, born September 1, 1928, married to Mercedes Sunico Rufino (deceased)  and subsequently to  Antonita Tabudlong Bustos; and (c) Consuelo "Chelo" McIlvain Roxas , born on November 19, 1928, married to Angel Javellana (deceased).  Their mother was Juanita Muriedas McIlvain, deceased.
    If you wish to verify the authenticity of the foregoing,allegations, please leave a message on this board. 

manny roxas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manoling1 (talkcontribs) 04:25, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Third shortest?[edit]

So Roxas' reign as president was third shortest? Whose reigns were shorter? 173.55.37.52 (talk) 04:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Manuel Roxas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]