Talk:Marilyn Ferguson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.


Please note that there are two people with the name Marilyn Ferguson; one is a Christian poet [1], and the other is the New Age author that is the subject of this Wikipedia article. --Alienlifeformz 19:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


This article needs a tremendous amount of work to eliminate its bias (ie, weasel words, NPOV, etc). It reads like an advertisement for her work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artifactblue (talkcontribs) 00:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

More than a year later, I agree that this article is still not neutral - it seems excessively positive and promotional, and needs to be rewritten in places to comply with our policies. Robofish (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Better this than nothing. 20 years later there will noone buy the books (if already availabe) because of this crypto-advertisement in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:40, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

This article did not seem Biased to me. Seems that the arguments against are being made by persons who have a bias against Marilyn Ferguson.Bill.zen (talk) 23:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)