Talk:Martial arts therapy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Given that these activities customarily contain few moral/philosophical teachings regarding conduct, this supports a tentative conclusion that traditional martial arts (which do typically offer moral/philosophical teachings) are superior to modern martial arts or combat sport training in reducing antisocial behaviour in children and adolescents.

The 2005 Olweus, Endresen study, it can't be used to draw that conclusion. Martial arts students were not as antisocial as boxers or weightlifters, but they were still more agressive than kids that did neither. Nor could this be adequately explained as a selection effect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.1.73.1 (talk) 08:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Edits[edit]

Thanks for the Wikipedia-specific edits by the people who have done so so far! -Scb steve

Image removed?[edit]

The image looked to be a good representation of the ideal in MAT. The explanation was somewhat confusing too. Uncycropedia? Is that some racist play on asian pronunciation Engrish FWBOarticle? Is it not cited or something? -Tyciol 19:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

references[edit]

for those articles listed in refs., I have

  1. removed the WP self-reference; link to Tai chi already present
  2. indicated the full ref including journal name for the PubMed cites--all of them respectable journals.
  3. indicated a ref. that was a personal web site.
  4. Commented that three of the site mentioned were inaccessible. DGG 02:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the help. I've fixed some of the broken links and added some other quality sources. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scb steve (talkcontribs) 01:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]