Talk:Material failure theory

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Yield (engineering) was copied or moved into Material failure theory with this edit on 29 March 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Tresca and von Mises are not brittle failure theories. They are for ductile materials. Thus, these two have been removed from the brittle section.

Hermanoere (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If these are not valid for brittle materials, neither are any of the others that are listed because they are based on the same ideas. You probably mean to say that phenomenological failure criteria don't work very well. I've reverted the change. Bbanerje (talk) 21:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]