Talk:Mathematical statistics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Mathematics (Rated Start-class, High-priority)
WikiProject Mathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mathematics rating:
Start Class
High Priority
 Field: Probability and statistics
This article has comments.
WikiProject Statistics (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page or join the discussion.

Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
 
This article has an assessment summary page.


Redirect to statistics[edit]

This article was started back in 2004 with the comment I really think we should separate MATH stat from APPLIED stat as much as possible, since a very different audience is interested in each and has grown little since then. The content here pretty much duplicates that in Statistics. I would say this has largely been a failed endevor and we would better off redirecting it to Statistics or possibly Statistical theory. --Salix alba (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree; applied statistics was redirected to statistics as well recently. Richard001 04:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
I have to agree. Perhaps this article could be developed, but given that that hasn't happened yet, I think a redirect is in order. JJL 12:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't think it's really feasible to separate math stat from applied stat or to attempt to categorise articles as one or the other. However I still think an article with this title could be useful, though I don't think it's vital to a maths encyclopedia. I've therefore downgraded its importance rating from Top to Mid. I don't think it needs to be a long article but it clearly needs some expansion so i've left it as stub-class. --Qwfp (talk) 13:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
As the creator of the original article at this title (which was very different from the current incarnation, BTW), I have no objection to making it a redirect to Statistics. If I ever get the notion to flesh out my original idea some more, I can resurrect it from the page history (assuming it's still a redirect and hasn't been deleted completely). - dcljr (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Mathematical statistics vs theoretical statistics[edit]

I once picked up a book on Mathematical Statistics in a bookshop that said in its introduction that it's purpose was "to build mathematical statistics, as opposed to theoretical statistics" (or it might have been vice-versa). However it didn't explain the distinction and I didn't buy the book. Can anyone enlighten me? If so, could you add something to the article? --Qwfp (talk) 13:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

IMO, there's no real difference between the two terms; they both refer to a mathematically rigorous treatment of the subject. But perhaps a distinction could be made based on whether you actually state and prove theorems along the way? - dcljr (talk) 14:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Data analysis[edit]

The article previously divided statistics into two parts, inferential and descriptive, but failed to mention randomized experiments and random samples. I tried to bring this article a bit more in agreement with the ASA recommendations for a first course in statistics for non-statisticians, by bringing in randomized experiments and random sampling early. This is consistent with the elementary books of David A. Freedman and David S. Moore. Thank you. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I think the question is ... why is this being said in this article, rather than in the statistics article? If it remains, its relevance to the topic of "mathematical statistics" needs to be pointed out somehow. (This applies to the whole of that section not just this revision.) Melcombe (talk) 10:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
I did not add the section on statistics being divided into two parts, descriptive and inferential, I merely corrected the error. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 13:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Redirect to statistics, part 2[edit]

See comments above, in 2008 people agreed to end this article because of duplication with the Statistics article, and I fully agree. Why hasn't it happened yet? Marcocapelle (talk) 19:25, 18 May 2014 (UTC)