Talk:Matthew Harrison (minister)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I would hope that this article, which even passes muster under the subjective WP Notability guideline would not be subject to speedy deletion.--Drboisclair (talk) 07:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harrison presidency[edit]

So, why did Harrison win the election? What issues will frame his presidency? What campaign promises / statements did he make? Which faction (if any) is he leaning toward? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.202.11.180 (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

People's dissatisfaction with Keishnick is the main reason. He leans toward the more Conservative faction. BenW (talk) 03:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if this type of dialogue is appropriate here; however, perhaps his statements in official periodicals of the LCMS might be discussed in the article itself.--Drboisclair (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To answer the question raised by this topic, the chief issues upon which Rev. Harrison was elected can be summed up this way: (1) concern for the theological integrity of American Lutheranism as a whole and of the Missouri Synod in particular, (2) the mission of the Church to carry out the proclamation of God's Word to our world and to carry out works of mercy to those in need, and (3) to open dialog between various factions within the Missouri Synod with the goal of bringing about consensus and unity. These three issues are often summed by his current motto: Martyria (Witness), Diakonia (Mercy), and Koinonia (Life Together). More details can be found here: http://abc3miscellany.blogspot.com/2010/09/lcms-board-and-commission-orientation.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.117.107.182 (talk) 00:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthew Harrison (minister). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]