Talk:Mechanics of Oscar Pistorius's running blades

Mechanics of Oscar Pistorius's running blades has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 25, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 25, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a set of running blades like Oscar Pistorius wears costs $30,000?

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Running Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Olympics: Paralympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Paralympics task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Disability

Mechanics of Oscar Pistorius's running blades is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

DYK nomination[edit]

Jack swift[edit]

There is no source for this here, nor on the Jack Swift article. Where did this come from? Swift's article doesn't even mention that he uses blades at all. (And please do not add it unless you have a source.) --LauraHale (talk) 13:55, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A source for what? If you're looking for references on Jack Swift, just check around. There's bound to be plenty of info available on his sports gear. Pkeets (talk) 18:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mechanics of Oscar Pistorius' running blades/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Meetthefeebles (talk · contribs) 15:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review. Give me a day or so to read through and leave comments... Meetthefeebles (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image check: infobox image is fine, the flex foot image is fine, the Iceland image is fine, the Olympic image is from flickr and is fine, the Clayton image is fine– all good!
Disambiguation links: Tool is dead, I'll check a little later.
External links: the link in ref.9 is dead–is there an alternative we could use?
Quickfail issues: no tags that I can see, references throughout, will check for copyright issues as we go, don't think this can be considered an 'ongoing issue', a couple of minor disputes in the history but these are hardly amount to an edit-war...

Okay, I'll have a read through and add comments as I go:

I think amputations should be blue linked.
Small grammar nitpick: suggest adding a comma between 'double' and 'below' in the opening sentence.
In the context of this article, I think athletics should also be blue linked. As should 200m and 400m. And also prosthetistand carbon fibre. Pistorius is a famous chap even among non-athletics fans and these might assist those readers. Otherwise, the lede is fine.
Suggest blue linking strength to weight ratio.
what is meant by '500 fps'? An non expert (like me) has no idea what that means. Suggest un-abbreviating?
Can we blue link metabolic and calorimetry? I would also link torque.

I've read this one fairly carefully and could not find much to comment upon at all. The prose used is very good and the article reads very nicely, is well illustrated and provides a solid extrapolation of an interesting sporting debate.

Reference checks
I checked ref.8, ref.10, ref.13, ref.18, ref.24 and ref.28 and they were all fine. The citation template is used to provide consistency.

Other than a few issues as outlined above, there is very little required of this one, so I'll pop on hold and allow the nominator to consider the changes suggested.

I added the suggested blue links and found another location for the bad reference. I've also linked fps, although I didn't expand it. In the interest of simplified prose, I disagree about the comma. Pkeets (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overall comments[edit]

A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated article.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I've assessed this article against the requirements of WP:WIAGA and, in the light of improvements carried out, I'm awarding GA-status. Congratulations! Please consider reviewing an article against the GA criteria. Meetthefeebles (talk) 19:48, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is it sufficiently noteworthy for there to be an article on Mr Pistorius' blades? That is like having an article on Dolly Barton's breasts! Surely it would be more appropriate for the article to be on running or athletic blades generally. The majority of the content could remain unchanged.203.184.41.226 (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lede[edit]

"Pistorius' eligibility to run in international able-bodied events is sanctioned by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF)." Which definition of sanctioned is this referring to? Sanctioned as in allowed or sanctioned as in not allowed? Sure, somebody can find this in the article, but it should be clearer in the lede. Thoughts?GreaseballNYC (talk) 23:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this be added as a subsection in the Flex-Foot Cheetah article?[edit]

Shouldn't this be a subsection on the Flex-Foot Cheetah article, instead of creating a whole new page for Pistorius' specific running blades? 67.8.227.76 (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mechanics of Oscar Pistorius' running blades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article needed on blades in general?[edit]

Hallo, I've just been doing some work on "India's blade runner" Kiran Kanoji and can't find an article about running blades in general - there's this about OP's blades in particular, and the general Prosthesis which has a section Prosthesis#Oscar_Pistorius within Prosthesis#Prosthetic_enhancement, although that section is more about robotics etc rather than sophisticated blades. There doesn's seem to be anything in the encyclopedia about running blades in general. Am I missing something, or would someone here like to start an article? I've put a similar messaage at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disability. Thanks. PamD 11:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions