|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microeconomics article.|
|Microeconomics has been listed as a level-3 vital article in Society. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as C-Class.|
|WikiProject Economics||(Rated C-class, Top-importance)|
|WikiProject Citizendium Porting (Last updated: Never)|
A question for people who watch this page
The second link in "External links" on the bottom of the page is obsolete () – the whole domain seems closed down. I am new to editing so I didn't dare just take it down. Maybe someone more experienced knows what the standard procedure is. (TormodOtterJohansson (talk) 17:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC))
Abuse of Market Power
What constitutes "abuse of market power" by a monopoly? Clearly all monopolies have market power And they follow the same profit maximizing rules as fims in a perfectly competitive market sturcture. --Jgard5000 (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)jgard5000 So when does the exercise of market power become abusive?
Average total cost is a vague and ambiguous term
The term "average total cost" is vague and ambiguous. Does total cost mean the total cost of production? If so what is it averaged over? Does total cost refer to the cost to produce a single unit of output? If so why not just call it cost? And why not talk about the average cost to produce a unit of output?
The article on macroeconomics has a section explaining the development of the field. Shouldnt this article have the same? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbertolotti (talk • contribs) 18:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- I proposed doing a history of micro article at one point (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:History_of_economic_thought/Archive_3#Micro_fork). It looks like you are working along similar lines. Maybe add more on classical economic theory and general equilibrium?--Bkwillwm (talk) 06:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Sure feel free to improve, I just tried to cover the usual stuff you find in micro books. Regarding classical economists point of view, I think that most of what they would have to say about micro is contained in the first book of Wealth of Nations:division of labour,real price, nominal price,wages,rent,profit. General equilibrium is a tricky subject, particurarly regarding mathematical proofs, so I think its rather hard to summarize on this page.--Lbertolotti (talk) 12:39, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
||It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
Relationship between price and quantity demanded
The statement is a bias in favor of unplanned economy. The set of choises just showes people buy what they can afford and price things at what they can afford. It is not necessarily the "happiest" set of choices. Both supply side and demand side could still be starving. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 07:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
In the Assumptions & Definitions section, it is stated (without explanation) that an actor's preferences are a metric space. However, as I understand both preferences and metric spaces, this seems to be incorrect. A metric space not only allows comparison between any two points, but it also has a "metric" that can associate a scalar magnitude to any point...e.g., with a metric space, you can not only say that "she prefers apples to oranges", but you can say "she prefers 1.6 apples to one orange" -- which may not necessarily be possible; as I understand it, this is the point of the distinction between "ordinal" and "cardinal" utility. 2601:9:3400:74:8541:A080:BAB0:70F5 (talk) 18:49, 16 May 2014 (UTC)