|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microsoft Dynamics article.|
|WikiProject Computing / Software||(Rated Stub-class)|
|WikiProject Microsoft||(Rated Stub-class)|
Is the last link the bottom spam?126.96.36.199 17:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Add Microsoft Template
Should the template Template:Microsoft be added to this article? After all, Microsoft Dynamics is listed in the table. Preview
- I just added it. If the template has a link, it should be here. --S.K. 20:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Article does not make sense
The MBS/Dynamics business road map has dramatically changed since this article was written. It would appear that there is confusion between Dynamics CRM (one of the priducts inthe Dynamics Range) and Dynamics (or MBS) the business unit.
Rather than a clean up, better would be to re-write this article about the Microsoft Business Solutions division.
Compare Dynamics Products
There seems to be 'hidden knowledge' within the Microsoft community regarding the differences between these products. I can find no comparisons on the Microsoft site - not even a 'use this product for these company types ...' and whenver the question of comparison is raised in a discussion group the answer is usuaully 'ask a microsoft partner to demonstrate the software to you'.
So - can someone provide a run down of the diffences in the products?
I know that someone could say - why not also compare SAP with JD Edwards while you are at it - why compare just these products?
I guess one answer is that an unbiased comparison between the top products would be helpful as well :) but at least a comparison of products supplied by the same company seems an obvious start.
I agree, with the above user, it's all very well listing a series of product that are "formerly" something else but without going through the links we don't actually know what they do? Which one is logistics, HR, CRM etc?
No this is not an advertisement, this is a proprietary product referenced to the maker's website, e.g. a Ford or Toyota automobile referenced to their company websites. The validity of the data is no less than biography versus autobiography in wikipedia articles of famous persons. Actually, I came to the wikipedia page because I needed a quick overview of the software and not the sales oriented PDF and Flash garbage on the manufacturers website and this article accomplishes that. If only Open Source Software bias was patrolled for. Shjacks45 (talk) 21:26, 27 August 2011 (UTC)