Talk:Armed Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Military of Kazakhstan)

Strange links[edit]

Not sure why but someones posted red links for variants of weapons and vehicles. Variants can be re-directed to the weapon there derived from. Please fix the links.

Iranian weapons[edit]

Ok...i dont know who keeps putting Iranian-made weapons on this page...but until some proof is brought forth i will continue to delete them from this page...Its pretty simple...PROOF or DELETE the choice is yours.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagle07 (talkcontribs) 17:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Equipment vandalism[edit]

The whole equipment section is rubbish; just now I removed from the list weapon systems that Kazakhstan does not have - actually laughable equipment claims like Challenger MTB, F/A-18 fighters and the like! Also all the numbers listed in the equipment section seem massively inflated! Whoever did add that this invented claims- I will delete them any time you add them, because what you do is simply said: vandalism! --noclador (talk) 13:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakh Air and Air Defence Force[edit]

Source: brinkster.net, July 2010

Имеется 12 военных и 9 гражданских аэродромов.

  • 600 Guards Aviation Base, Жетиген (Николаевка), Алма-Атинская, Military Unit No.65229- 40 MiG-29/Су-24-б. 149 бап (было 28 Су-24, возм.Су-25) и б.715 иап передислоцирован из Луговое(Джамбул)- полностью укомплектованы и находятся в боевой готовности 20 машин и их экипажи. МиГ-25Р на хранениии с Балхаша
  • 602 Aviation Base, Chimkent/Чимкент, в/ч 55652- Су-17, Су-25- в\ч 55652- В мае 1992 года в/ч 55652 была расформирована, а в октябре этого же года создана как база для хранения самолетов. В 1995 году шымкентская часть стала базой резерва самолетов с правом их вылетов. А еще год спустя командование ВВС РК приняло решение создать здесь авиабазу.
  • 603 Aviation Base, Almaty/Алма-Ата, в/ч 53975- 7 сам.,6 верт.-Ан-12, 26, Ми-8- б.457 сап, 12 верт.-Ми-8- 27 саэ. 218 осаэ
  • 604 Aviation Base, Талды-Курган, в/ч 21751- Су-27, МиГ-27- на хранении -б.129 иап, на хранении 1 МиГ-27, 5 МиГ-23, 3 МиГ-23УБ, 4 Су-27, 2 Су-27УБ и более 60 МиГ-21
  • 607 авиабаза, Учарал, Алма-Атинская, в/ч 01852- б.485 овп
  • 609 авиабаза, валхаш, в/ч 53898- Л-39 с Луговой- учебный центр - б.39 орап- 15 Миг-25Р,5 Су-24МР
  • 610(607) авиабаза, Сары-Арка (Караганда), в/ч 50185- Миг-31, возможно несколько Су-27- в/ч 50185
  • 612 авиакомендатура, Тараз (Джамбул), в/ч 14157- б.181 овп- Ми-8
  • 678 авиакомендатура, Луговая, в/ч 64207
  • 620 авиаполк, Астана
  • 637 обс, Алма-Ата, в/ч 78460
  • 642 опс, Алма-Ата, в/ч 45164
  • 1120 обатс и рто, Талды-Курган, опс
  • 410 зрбр, Аягуз, в/ч 97616
  • 45 зрп, Жетинген, в/ч 64049- возможно б.300 зрбр в Майские Пруды, Алма-Ата- ранее возможно 87 зрбр, С-300
  • 504 зрп, Астана, в/ч 12890- включает зрдив в Малиновке на С-300
  • 505 зрп, Вячеславка, Акмолинской, в/ч 44813- возможно б.501 зрбр в Сарань (15 км от Караганды)
  • 4100 озрд, Аягуз, в/ч 26363
  • 4101 озрд, Аягуз, в/ч 36814
  • 500 брПВО, Алма-Ата, в/ч 97617
  • 501 брПВО, Сарань, в/ч 44803
  • 502 брПВО, Семипалатинск, в/ч 31767
  • 503 брПВО, Актау, в/ч 51809
  • 504 брПВО, Чимкент, в/ч 10216- б.56 ртбр из сух.сил
  • 220 ртп, Уральск, в/ч 03854

SKS[edit]

The SKS should be added under small arms. List it for parade and ceremonial.

Nuclear Weapons[edit]

I want to know about nuclear weapons in Kazakhstan.111.251.205.221 (talk) 07:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazakh Navy Ensign.gif Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Kazakh Navy Ensign.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kazakh Navy Ensign.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airbusmilitary.com/PressRelease/tabid/133/ArticleId/191/Airbus-Military-signs-contract-with-Kazakhstan-for-two-C295-aircraft.aspx
    Triggered by \bairbusmilitary\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Defense Minister[edit]

Please change the Minister of Defense. Since 3 April 2014 Serik Akhmetov holding this office. --89.73.25.135 (talk) 20:42, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Armed Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armed Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Armed Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named " World Air Forces 2017 ":

  • From Serbian Air Force and Air Defence: "World Air Forces 2017". Flightglobal Insight. 2017. Retrieved 14 January 2017.
  • From Myanmar Air Force: "World Air Forces 2017". Reed Business Information. 2017. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  • From Czech Air Force: "World Air Forces 2017". Flightglobal Insight. December 2016. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  • From Chilean Air Force: "World Air Forces 2017". Flightglobal Insight. 2017. Retrieved 19 March 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 17:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armed Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Armed Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "World Air Forces 2017":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 20:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]