The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0(talk) 02:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
If it's just two articles where confusion may exist, but the names are different (as they will be with 'of' and 'for', apart from the order of words, of course), then the way to do it is via a hatnote. Schwede66 03:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Support. By the way, I have no problem with supporting this move. Good Ol’factory(talk) 03:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Support if no other Wikipedia article exists whose primary name is "Ministry for Culture and Heritage". --Polaron | Talk 14:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have removed the following content from the article:
We work to enrich the lives of all New Zealanders by supporting our dynamic culture and preserving our heritage. We support many of New Zealand’s arts, media, heritage and sports organisations; advise government on cultural matters and provide research and resources for everyone to access. The organisations we fund deliver a wide range of cultural experiences for all to enjoy.
That's a copyviolation of content from the Ministry's website (it was added by an anon). Apart from the copyviolation, this is an encyclopedia, so the content needs to be accordingly. The article is not there as a copy of the Ministry's website. Schwede66 02:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)