From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Gender Studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. |
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Misandry received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 |
This is not a forum for general discussion of misandry. Any such messages will be deleted or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Misandry at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk. |
[edit] Equal rights
Hi, I made the first two paragraphs of this page more comparable to the female version (misogyny), since Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be in favor of one sex over the other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.53.37.222 (talk) 01:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
The language and sources used in this article feel somewhat anti-feminist. It's a string of examples of people "identifying" misandry in feminism, and I think it reflects rather poorly as a result. People often take wikipedia at face value, so thhis kind of language is dangerous. The last thing we need to do is reinforce public bias against feminism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.206.124 (talk) 17:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- This article has a history of POV problems and antifeminist soapboxing. If you have well-sourced information about other sorts of misandry, it might be good to add. / edg ☺ ☭ 19:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- There is no public bias against feminism. On the other hand, there is a real public bias against men Wwmargera (talk) 09:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Talk pages are for discussing improvements of the article's content, not for sharing our opinions and discussing the topic generally. Feel free to contribute sourced and cited information to improve this article, or discuss specific issues you have with the existing content. Thanks. -Andrew c [talk] 14:32, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- I may not have made this clear, but I was replying to the post by 174.112.206.124. That user specifically implied that there was a public bias against feminism. If I was sharing my opinions and discussing the topic generally, then so was that user. Wwmargera (talk) 13:06, 23 December 2009 (UTC)