Talk:Mobile commerce
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mobile commerce article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||
Contents |
[edit] Comments
Basically there would be no reason to reject the suggestion. Only it would need a sound editing of the M-Commerce article in the first place and then a further edit to remove the resulting redundancies. That would take some effort. Therefore no hasty action, I would say. --Raj 23:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Why are the following links allowed, but my attempt to add a link to another commercial entity (www.easyreach.com) was rejected by absolutDan?
- KushCash Mobile Payment System, Secure Wireless Transfers Corp. (U.S.A)
- Vipera Mobile Commerce Platform
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Greyhound4334 (talk • contribs) 05:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- As I mentioned on your talk page just now, I have removed those other 2 links as well - they are not appropriate for this article either. Cheers --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
THanks for the explanation. Makes sense now. Greyhound4334 19:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Hi, I suggest this article is moved to "Mobile commerce", as it is not a proper noun. It would also be in line with electronic commerce. Somno (talk) 01:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Copy edit
| WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Started a copy edit of the article. It's getting late; I'll finish it up tomorrow. Macwhiz (talk) 05:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Predictions
This article had a lot of text written as predictions. "This will..." "...are exploring..." Where those things are now commonplace, I've altered the text to make statements of fact instead of predictions. Where that wasn't true, I've deleted the statements, in keeping with Wikipedia policy that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. If anyone objects to these edits, I ask that before you restore them, you first find reliable secondary sources to back up the claim, and add appropriate references. Macwhiz (talk) 14:04, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Youth culture section
I had to remove chunks of the youth culture section because they were incoherent, and there were no references to use to try and decipher them. I couldn't even find good sources with a Google search. Additionally, large parts of it seemed to be promotional or predictive in nature. Frankly, I'm not sure this section belongs in this article; it seems like it better belongs under Memetics. This section needs more references, or it needs to be removed as unsubstantiated and of limited relevance. Macwhiz (talk) 15:19, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
