Talk:Moccasin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featured[edit]

This page was featured on Portal:Native American culture.

Missing info[edit]

There needs to be a more precise etymological history of the word. "Native American" encompasses so many languages, often completely different, that it is not a sufficient distinction. Not to mention that no references are given. VanTucky Talk 03:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge Driving moccasins to this article[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Merge Driving moccassins into Moccassins on the grounds that its scope is narrow and will comfortably fit on this page. Klbrain (talk) 21:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A user placed a merge tag on Driving moccasins, suggesting it's content be merged here back in February 2012. However, only the tag was placed and no rationale for merger was provided nor was discussion initiated. Although it does appear that the article is very short and the information could fit here well, so a merger sounds reasonable. What do others think? WTF? (talk) 13:34, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry. I thought that driving moccasins were a minor variation on moccassins without much content, and therefore, that that article could easily fit here instead. Thanks. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 16:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I do agree to some extent, but I have seen several pages like that were a variant has both its own page and a section in the main page. And that seems to usually be approved. Just one thing to consider. DaltonCastle (talk) 00:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely, that's how things *should* work, given that the independent article has room to expand into a complete article in its own right. I don't think Driving moccassins has much room to expand beyond a stub. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 16:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Corn Husk Moccasins[edit]

Info should be added on corn husk moccasins . . . Though I am uncertain how much info can be reasonably added since it is so hard to find anything regarding it. All I have been able to ascertain is that they existed and that some people do make them still. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.254.52.22 (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moccasin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal from list[edit]

An entry in List of colors: G–M contained a link to this page.

The entry is :

  • Moccasin

I don't see any evidence that this color is discussed in this article and plan to delete it from the list per this discussion: Talk:List_of_colors#New_approach_to_review_of_entries

If someone decides that this color should have a section in this article and it is added, I would appreciate a ping.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:55, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]