Talk:Mohammed Ahmad Ghulam Rabbani

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

removal of valid and useful wikilinks[edit]

This article is one of a series that had a number of valid and useful wikilinks removed with an edit summary "unlink interpretation of questionable source". I don't think this is a sufficient explanation, and I don't think this removal of wikilinks was a good idea.

I think the wikilinks should be restored to this article and the other articles. Geo Swan (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful[edit]

Another contributor moved a key sentence from the first paragraph of this article -- that this individual had been held in the CIA's black sites to lower down in the article.

After moving that sentence from the paragraph where it was referenced, to a paragraph of its own, they then added an {{unreferenced}} tag to that article.

I am going to add my voice to those other contributors who have noticed this contributor not being careful in moving passages around, without moving or copying the associated references, and then adding {{unreferenced}} tags, and ask them to please be more careful.

In my opinion there is no question that every one of the 100 or so captives who has been held in CIA custody should have that CIA custody mentioned right in the lead paragraph of their article, and I request the contributor who moved this information to explain why they did so. Geo Swan (talk) 23:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the part that is Ad hominem and can be seen as and attack: And to add your voice to those other contributors? Who do you mean? The other editor you worked closely together in this section? I do not know anybody else who has used minor mistakes of an editor as an start to attack them in all the time i am editing Wikipedia. I can only say be careful. To pick out a few instances where another editor may has made a mistake and to use this instances to start an attack against this contributer is something not seen well in the community and user can be blocked for that as it violates the core values of the Wikipedia community. You may have a look at WP:GOODFAITH and other related policies.
For the content issue: You may have noticed that i have created a new section for the topic as i also see it as important and it is the first section in the article. Impossible to overlook. You may improve it from there and add more information to the section and the lead. For the unreferenced tag. Why didn't you just replace the the tag with the citation if you know there is one? Takes a few seconds to do so and other editors are watching and will noticed that. IQinn (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Mohammed Ahmad Ghulam Rabbani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly cleared for release.[edit]

According to Samaa TV https://www.samaa.tv/news/2021/10/guantanamo-bay-frees-mistaken-karachi-taxi-driver-after-17-years/

"Ahmad Rabbani's release was announced late Friday night by Reprieve, a legal action NGO, that works on such cases." https://reprieve.org/uk/2021/10/22/ahmed-rabbani-cleared-for-release-from-guantanamo/ -- Jeandré, 2021-10-25t08:36z

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mohammed_Ahmad_Ghulam_Rabbani&oldid=1209936602"