Talk:Mohammedan SC (India)
| WikiProject India | (Rated Stub-class) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Football | (Rated Stub-class) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
[edit] Clarify
Football = soccer in this case right?Bakaman Bakatalk 23:58, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, of course. The game is actually known as Football to almost everyone outside the USA. --Ragib 00:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Just making sure, they do have NFL Europe and things like that.Bakaman Bakatalk 00:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mohammedan sc logo.png
Image:Mohammedan sc logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
