Talk:Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment
|WikiProject Physics||(Rated C-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Energy||(Rated C-class)|
I take it that this probably was copied from a paper for a class? If it is not copyright, it should be better wikified, i.e. get rid of references to figures that don't exist and wikilink important aspects. Lcolson 21:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. A lot of interesting stuff in this article, but it needs a lot of re-working. Besides the needed Wikifying I'd suggest at the very least it needs an introductory paragraph. Robotman1974 13:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- The phrase 'we had confidently expected' suggests that at least some of the material is copied straight from the original source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
It needs a short first section providing overview. It needs links. The referenced pictures needs to be either uploaded or not mentioned.
- There are some stars in the article, referring to footnotes. The footnotes aren't there. They need to be added, or the references (stars) need to be removed.
- Reference 17 is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylemech (talk • contribs) 04:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
--Ysangkok 08:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
The article name should be changed [back] to Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment. Because this is a specific named project and facility, its name is a proper name which should be in title case. I will go to request the move. --orlady 13:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Was the reactor really running on Pu239 ?
Is there any reference for the reactor using Pu239 as fissile fuel (not only as a small impurity) ? I could not find any hint for this, more of the opposite: The first fuel was U-235, than U-233 (until 1969). The articles about cleanup show some Pu, but not much compared to U233.--Ulrich67 (talk) 09:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)