Talk:Moroccan Western Sahara Wall

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Moroccan Western Sahara Wall article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Morocco Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Help expand the project:

You can help! يمكنكم أن تساهموا

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mounir Charïbi
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Morocco articles and Unknown-importance Morocco-related articles.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to articles in Category:Morocco articles missing geocoordinate data
Photo : See requested photographs in Morocco
Stubs : Morocco stubs
Other :
- Translate from Arabic: Sellam Ameziane, Mrebih Rebbu

Africa: Western Sahara B‑class Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Western Sahara portal This article is supported by WikiProject Western Sahara (assessed as High-importance).

This file has been used by a media organization in: Kaushik (2017-03-23). "Moroccan Wall: The Longest Minefield in The World". Amusing Planet.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

New map[edit]

Yes, I know, theoretically is map is somewhat OR, but it hardly shows anything different to the present one. It just improves an sketch map to one based on geodata.--Antemister (talk) 15:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know as well as I do that WP:OR is non-negotiable policy. In fact, even if it was sourced, your map would qualify as fringe at best, as it goes against how the topic is portrayed in the overwhelming majority of reliable sources. M.Bitton (talk) 00:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, theoretically it is OR, and the maps we have are of course not incorrect, but just of a relatively low scale. The purpose of the UN which is one of the sources of the maps we have now is not to provide a detailed depiction of these wall, but rather giving an impression of it (they even have a disclaimer on it!), the other source is a sketch map[1]. Have consulted a lot of sources before, did not find a really accurate one and that's why I started to develop it. Of course it is not in contradiction to other sources, it rather confirms them (the only issue might the counting, here the sources vary). Anyway, that OR topic applies to a lot of maps here: There is a huge number of completely unsourced "own work" ones, others are based on historical geodesy, other like mine on aerial images, photos of touristic sign, compilation of newspaper report etc. Of course they these are accepted here.--Antemister (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you've managed to source your map from Google Maps, so I'm not sure about licensing there. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The licencing, even if it's an issue, is the least of our concerns. The fundamental problem here is the original research that contradicts what RS say. This is simply unacceptable, otherwise, we might as well let everyone have a go at redrawing the various maps according to their interpretation of what they see on Google Earth. Frankly, I'm surprised we're even discussing this. M.Bitton (talk) 16:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your claims about the UN's map are completely and utterly baseless. Their standard disclaimer about the borders, which is present in all their maps, has nothing whatsoever to do with the wall. M.Bitton (talk) 16:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]