Talk:Mount Barker, South Australia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I lived here

Former good article nomineeMount Barker, South Australia was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 13, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
November 7, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

To do[edit]

School links[edit]

The schools are currently linked as references. Should the links be

  • Left as references
Mount Barker has four high schools: Mount Barker High School (public)[1], Cornerstone College (Lutheran)[2], Saint Francis de Sales (Catholic)[3], and Mount Barker Waldorf School (Waldorf)[4].
  • Be turned into proper links
Mount Barker has four high schools: Mount Barker High School (public, [1]), Cornerstone College (Lutheran, [2]), Saint Francis de Sales (Catholic, [3]), and Mount Barker Waldorf School (Waldorf , [4]).
  • Be removed
Mount Barker has four high schools: Mount Barker High School (public), Cornerstone College (Lutheran), Saint Francis de Sales (Catholic), and Mount Barker Waldorf School (Waldorf).
  • Replace with wikilinks
Mount Barker has four high schools: Mount Barker High School (public), Cornerstone College (Lutheran), Saint Francis de Sales School (Catholic), and Mount Barker Waldorf School (Waldorf).

Opinions please

  • Remove Links --TheJosh 12:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either keep as footnotes, or replace as wikilinks. I really would only prefer the wikilinks if all four were not red, and at least one was a significant article. --Scott Davis Talk 15:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikilinks I didn't event think of that... --TheJosh 12:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • No wikilinks for smaller schools - These are non-notable, small schools. By making a redlink, you are requesting an article. However, Mount Barker South Primary School and St Marks Primary School, for example, are completely non-notable, and their respective articles would be put through the deletion process. Do not request articles that are sure to be deleted. For schools with existing articles and schools of higher education, leave as wikilinks, but otherwise, use references. Also, as an aside, external links should never be used in prose. Raime 13:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Keynote picture[edit]

What should the keynote picture be? see Mount Barker, South Australia (Gallery) None of them are probably appropriate though... --TheJosh 01:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since the above page was deleted, see the Commons Gallery here. Also, I would say that no image on that page would be appropriate for a keynote. When in doubt, use a government building if possible. Raime 13:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

go the bus stop! (joking). perhaps we should be thinking of a good angle to the town to get. anyone local got any ideas? --TheJosh 10:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA failed[edit]

An Adelaidean here. Although this article is quite good in content in some places, it is also a bit messy and policy violating in other places

  • Some parts are tagged with {{cn}}
  • Contractions are used in the article
  • Many parts of the article don't have a source. Some of the things about the existence of a school or a police station or a shopping centre should be sourced simply be referring to a page of the street directory. However, things like the internals of the shopping centre might not be feasible. Are there any possible local newspapers? Because using personal obervation is not allowed per WP:NOR even if it is trivial.
  • comment about school zoning needs a source, preferably, but it might be hard, since they don't normally publish high school zoning distrcits in public.
  • The refs that are there need to be filled out with date, publisher, accessdate.
  • In the public services section, the one line sentences need to be merged.
  • Personally, I don't think it's necessary to mention that the library has internet, that seems to veer into advertising a bit.
  • The indepth description of the disable ramp at the cinema and the product prices of certain locations need to be culled.
  • The prose is too informal and needs to be more disciplined. Phrases like "footy" "up the hill" are not appropriate and you should not use contractions
  • "The Woolworths Complex is not really a shopping centre as such, but is just a Woolworths and a few small shops nearby." ORish statements like this should not be included. You chould just say what is in there.
  • Should wikilink the census stuff like UK, NZ, Afrikaans etc
  • In general there are quite a few awkward sentences and the whole article needs a copyedit "Mount Barker has since developed into a large urban centre, which is developing very rapidly" -> "Mount Barker is rapidly developing into a large urban centre"

Regards, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic photo of the bus stop! But tell me, does Mount Barker have any public toilets? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.228.178.108 (talk) 21:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mount Barker, South Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]