Talk:Mozambican Civil War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Military history (Rated Start-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale.
WikiProject Africa / Mozambique (Rated Start-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Mozambique (marked as Top-importance).
 


Start of hostilities[edit]

An anonymous user changed the date 'On September 25, 1964, Frelimo solders, with logistical assistance from the surrounding population, attacked the administrative post at Chai in the province of Cabo Delgado' to 'On September 25, 1965, Frelimo solders, with logistical assistance from the surrounding population, attacked the administrative post at Chai in the province of Cabo Delgado .' Is this correct? Greenman 21:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

A Google search says no, so I reverted it. Icek 06:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Renamo attrocities[edit]

I want someone to cite credible sources for RENAMO's alleged widespread use of child soldiers, a concerted campaign against civilians, and a more balanced view of FRELIMO's own misdeeds. The section on RENAMO seems biased and whitewashes FRELIMO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.111.29.1 (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Done --Rappatoni (talk) 02:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Expansion of the article[edit]

I expanded the article and added some sources. However, there are still some sections which need better sourcing in my opinion. The information about the PCN stems from the article about Uria Simango. Unfortunately this article does not contain detailed sources. I will add the sources about the Rhodesian operations in Mozambique soon, just need to read some of the stuff provided in the Rhodesian Bush War article. By the way, simply "recycled" the maps from that article, because they seemed fitting. I hope this is ok with guidelines, I could not find anything about it.

The section about the Angolan Civil War seemed to me mainstreamy enough to not being in need of addtional sourcing but the corresponding sources can surely be found in the article about the Angolan Civil War.

What else...

Terminology: I used the terms "black"/"white" in the section about the Apartheid related conflicts. As I don't know which terminology is typically used in the African context, this seemed easiest to me, as "Native-Africans" is e.g. a term that applies for many whites in Africa too, especially for the Boers who have been araound for some 400 years. So things would get complicated here and I actually could not be bothered to use something like "Africans-of-European-Descent" (which strictly speaking still wouldn't be correct, since most Boers have some black ancestors). I think the "black/white" terminology is justified here, as this terminology surely describes best, how the conflict was perceived by the actors themselves (hence i.e. "Black Consciousness"). However, if there is a convention on terminology here that I am not aware of, please just change it.

And could please someone correct the article in terms of grammar and spelling? I try to do my best, but am not a native speaker, so there are surely errors.

Kindly,

Max Rapp --Rappatoni (talk) 02:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

The Mozambican Civil War and the Cold War[edit]

I've removed the Cold War section because it was unnecessary and misleading. FRELIMO maintained good relations with the West; RENAMO only had support from South Africa and Rhodesia, though they tried and failed to gain US backing (there was a RENAMO lobby in Washington that enjoyed the support of Jesse Helms and Bob Dole, but they were never successful in convincing Reagan). No real need to insert a Cold War context when it was almost non-existent; but if it must be mentioned, then it should be done properly. This would be a good place to start: http://books.google.ro/books?id=14YWKklpbTEC&pg=PA193#v=onepage&q&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.120.227.59 (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

You are certainly right about the US not supporting RENAMO. However, as you mention above, there was a significant Pro-RENAMO lobby in the US as well as in other countries believing that RENAMO should be supported in order to fight communism. In fact, RENAMO did receive significant financial and organisational support from private sources and NGOs in the west. Apart from this, South Africa's Apartheid regime used the Cold War context to sell its own policy as "anti-communist". This may be a reason why the west failed to take more significant action against South Africa. All this is only understandable only within the context of cold war, "roll-back" etc. which is why I included this section. You are however right that it needs improvement and better sourcing. I will try to do that when I find the time to work on this article again. Or maybe - as you pointed out a possible source - you want to work on it?
Yours, --Rappatoni (talk) 01:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
I actually got that source from the Wikipedia article on RENAMO, so copying the relevant bit from that article would be one idea. The South Africans tried to sell support for RENAMO as anti-communism, but they fortunately failed. To me, leaving the section as it was implied that they were successful; it described a strategy that worked elsewhere without mentioning that it didn't work here.89.120.227.59 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Mozambican Civil War[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Mozambican Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "allafrica":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 21:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC)