Talk:Muntz Street

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Muntz Street has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
WikiProject Football (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon
Portal icon Association football portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
Portal icon English football portal
This article is supported by the English football task force.
 
WikiProject West Midlands (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

[edit] GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Muntz Street/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I made a minor copyedit; otherwise all good.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Muntz_Street&oldid=272142994"
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export