Talk:Murray Aynsley Hill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Murray AynsleyMurray Aynsley HillChristchurch City Libraries in their place names document, and Gordon Ogilvie in The Port Hills of Christchurch both refer to the area as 'Murray Aynsley Hill'. Rather than just moving the page, I thought I'd bring this up for discussion, as I myself have known the area by the simpler name 'Murray Aynsley'. --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:56, 8 May 2014 (UTC) --Relisted. Andrewa (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Schwede66 19:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Relisting comment: Nom seems to be having a vote each way, and neither really relates to WP:AT. Andrewa (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I must have confused you, Andrewa; sorry for that. There's only been one vote, and that is from the nominator (me) to move the article. What I'm pointing out is that the two sources that are probably most authoritative refer to the area as Murray Aynsley Hill, rather than the shorter Murray Aynsley, which would indicate that the article should be moved. I'm slightly puzzled why you say that this is not related to WP:AT; maybe you could elaborate on this. The reason that I haven't simply moved the article, but put up a formal move request, is that I myself know the area by its shorter name. Hence I wanted to give others the chance to comment and clarify the situation, but there doesn't seem to be anyone else interested in this article. Given that my 'knowledge' is obviously not an authoritative source, the two sources referred to should take precedence, and the article should be moved (unless we subsequently have further comments here). Schwede66 21:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.