Talk:Mussenden Temple

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National Trust template[edit]

The National Trust template has been removed as it is appropriate on the pages for the various Trusts that it mentions, but not on the pages of separate properties. In addition, the template appeared only on the pages of a few properties. Grstain | Talk 21:53, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't part of the reason that the template only appears on the pages of a few properties because a couple of editors have been removing them..? I don't understand your reason(s) for removing the template from NT property articles to be honest, and you'll have to convince me to not re-add the template to this and other articles. I had assumed that one of the reasons for creating the template was to include it on the relevant pages: ie those articles about National Trust properties. --Mal 14:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed - it belongs to the National Trust, so why not highlight this with the template? Blowmonkey 12:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mussenden Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop's Quote[edit]

The Bishop is quoted as saying, "It will give employment to the poor, to the district and employment." It will give employment to . . . employment? This makes no sense. No source is given for the quote, but it is most likely in error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4070:6240:A438:F063:77C:395F (talk) 16:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From the National Trust article on this building[edit]

This paints a whole new picture of the building National trust

Some say the Earl Bishop and Frideswide were far too close - when the Bishop disagreed with his long-suffering wife, he often went to stay with his 'cher cousin'.

No smoke without fire?

Without actually naming them, the Freeman’s Journal suggested that the relationship between the Earl Bishop and his niece was not altogether proper and - although this was later denied in print - the mud stuck.

Frideswide married a wealthy and elderly London banker named Daniel Mussenden and, as a gift to her, the Earl Bishop built the splendid library called the Mussenden Temple. This was to house part of his celebrated Library and was supposed to be a place to which Frideswide, when she visited, could retire.

Frideswide's early demise

The temple was finished in 1783 but it's said that the mortification of the scandal affected Frideswide health, which had always been delicate. Although there is no proof, it may have contributed to her early death. The Temple, which was to have been her refuge, became her memorial when she died in 1785.