Talk:My Sassy Girl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Korea (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Korean cinema working group.
WikiProject Film (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.
 

Contents

[edit] Original story

It seems these are the posts by the author, in korean: http://blue.utb.edu/tyi/Korean/yubgi/yubgi01.htm Should it be put in the links section?

And someone put a translation of some chapters here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0293715/board/nest/55549493—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.66.219.58 (talkcontribs) 23:40, February 8, 2007.

Unless there are reliable sources which state that, no. --Crossmr 06:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

The article needs a spoiler!! It totally ruined the movie! 142.161.93.216 00:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia no longer carries spoiler warnings.--Atlantima (talk) 01:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reads like a forum post

This article, while very complete, is written like a forum post and should be rewritten. --Victor 3 July 2005 12:45 (UTC)

I've done some cleaning up, but it could benefit from the attention of someone who has actually seen the movie. -- Visviva 08:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 4 quintuplets?

In the Easter Eggs section, there is reference made to "each of the four quintuplets". The problem is, quintuplets is five people, quadruplets is four people. I don't know whether the number is 4 or 5 in the movie, so I cannot correct it. User:202.161.247.107

There are five in the movie. I've corrected it. —Lowellian (reply) 20:45, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
Isn't the girl's father one of the quituplets??

[edit] Koreanname template

Responding to Bobet: It does kind of look awkward with the Koreanname template now...

[edit] American movie?

Is there still going to be an American remake of this film? I've heard that there won't be ... SyFyMichael 03:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Actually, there might be a remake of this movie. It might be a bad remake though. [1] --Snkcube 04:30, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
I honestly hate remakes of anything, but to tell you the truth, dubs and remakes are getting better abd better over the years, IMO, especially with anime dubs. The voices aren't as good as the seiyu yet but they're getting there... sort of. --Kiriyama 20:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Yeah they are can you believe it?! And that's not even the start. First it was Il Mare aka Siworae which was re-made into The Lake House, and now My Sassy Girl -___-* they're also re-making the BEST (in my opinion) J-horror film, One Missed Call. It's also releasing in 2007. Hollywood has made plans to re-make about 25 South Korean films. I despise re-makes. Especially when the original movies were so amazing.

Roy Lee is the guy (or one of the guys) behind all of these remakes. It doesn't stop at the few you mentioned, just look at his IMDb page. He lacks any respect for the history of film, which is ultimately proven by the Ikiru remake that will soon be a reality. Robixsmash 19:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Original Research

The interesting facts section needs some major cleanup. A lot of it is opinion and conjecture and none of it is sourced. It also needs to be renamed "Trivia" or something similar because interesting facts expressed an opinion about the facts, see WP:NPOV.--Crossmr 18:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Someone has already overhauled it, but from what I understand, a lot of the "interesting facts" come off of the director's commentary on the r3k DVD. Robixsmash 07:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Films Based on Non-Fiction Novels

There is no indication that this was based on a non-fiction novel, and I have removed the category. If someone wants to provide rationale for that, they can add it back in. Leaptad (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export