This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Culture of Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Néstor García Canclini, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
It seems that we need to pay attention to those who can add content, and those who are doing the work that should be done by admins or sysops. The difference is that sysops know, for the most part, how to work with and under consensus. This page is an example of creating pages and pages of nothingness, referring to another page out of the encyclopedia that does exactly the same as Wikipedia is trying to do with respect to biographies only that much better, at this point, it is not funny anymore, it is ironic and sad. Is this a contribution or a disservice to Wikipedia's ideals? Well I guess is debatable as with every single issue.
The issue remains the same, inputting information without conducting a proper research just because you can do it, What is the rush? while doing this you are chasing, and harassing others with some suppose self-acclaimed "super-linguistic skills", only because they are working in the same areas or topics that you pretend to own or control. That is not working together with other wikipedists at all. It is ridiculous, that some people have so much time on their hands, or that enormous amount of disrespect over their shoulders towards other contributors.
I think that this user can contribute a little more by learning to add more content to the pages he/she is creating, because by now, thanks to this user, there are a lot o pages with labels, templates and all sort of things but no real content which is the main focus of this project. I am concern by the quality and verifiable sources supporting all the pages that have been touched by these type of users. Giving the proper distance and time the result of the observation on this behavior has been proven to be a pattern based upon a set of deeply rooted beliefs of the cognitive level of this type of users. Something that many people have and are facing "graciously" as I am writing this report on situ. -"-Todos Llegan de Noche, todos se van de día" 19:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
