Talk:NASA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article NASA has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Spaceflight (Rated GA-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

This article has comments here.

WikiProject United States / Government (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (marked as High-importance).
 

This article has comments here.

WikiProject Technology (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

This article has comments here.

WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 
This article has an assessment summary page.
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for NASA:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Cleanup: Images
  • Expand: Science section with sub-section about space technology

Uninformative Budget Graph[edit]

Look at the graph in the "Budget" section. It doesn't tell very much, only what percentage of government spending goes toward NASA every year. Is this designed to mislead people? I don't know. Either way, a much better graph would be the cost of NASA per year in, say, 2007 dollars, or, alternately, the cost of NASA as a percentage of the GDP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.232.191.2 (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

ABMA ?[edit]

Hey, LTWR, IC (long time wikipedia reader, infrequent contributor)

The NASA page says Von Braun worked for ABMA, but for my best efforts I could not ascertain what ABMA was, or its relevancy. Could use a link. Sorry if using improper channels.

-Jack — Preceding unsigned comment added by Compdude47 (talkcontribs) 10:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

See Army Ballistic Missile Agency. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Scans of NASA-issued photo IDs[edit]

Someone scanned a pair of NASA photo IDs and uploaded them to illustrate James H. Trainor. Those images are now up for deletion at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 January 27#File:James H Trainor NASA Badge 1.jpg and Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 January 27#File:James H Trainor NASA Badge 2.jpg--GrapedApe (talk) 12:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator[edit]

I just started it and am making a bit of a pig's ear out of it. Could someone please have a look-see. Also, someone added some strange "see alsos" that I'm not sure about. Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

To-do list?[edit]

Can anyone clarify what is wrong with the images that they would need cleanup for? Possibly @Soerfm:? The request for expansion about "Space Technology" is also unclear. Have these items been addressed already? 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 14:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)