Talk:NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts
This article is very one sided right now. There must be something to say about NIAC besides accusations of corruption.
- It is equally one-sided now. All criticism of NIAC is gone now. I think NPOV is warrented, because the soundness of NIAC projects is very much in question. DonPMitchell (talk) 16:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
http://moonandback.com/2011/08/08/nasa-selects-visionary-advanced-technology-concepts-for-study/ curious to know wich are the russian, indian and chineese equivalent --Beaucouplusneutre (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
scathing criticism of NIAC as unscientific embezzlement / patronage scheme
may be found here http://nasa-niac.narod.ru/ although unfortunately it's mostly in Russian. But this article http://nasa-niac.narod.ru/p7.htm is in fairly readable English. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 07:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)