Talk:NEAR Shoemaker

Space craft temperature - danger from aliens - funny?

the space craft was indeed cool, and i think that it should have not been shut down on eros. attempts should have been made to recover the craft and pilot it back to earth, or the space station, because the aliens could find it and then attack our planet and kill our population to harvest the earth of its remaining natural resources, before moving on to the next planet that advertises itself by leaving old probes in orbit. if everyone dies by aliens, i hope the boffins at NASA have it on their consciences that it is their fault, until their consciences are stopped by extensive mind probing. 194.72.50.157 (talk) 09:43, 2 March 2005‎ (UTC)

• Hilarious. :-) --ScottyBoy900Q 04:19, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
  • This is not hilarious. It is a serious matter. Leaving this deactivated probe on a near-earth asteroid, which basically shares the same orbit as Earth itself around the sun, is a very dangerous way to advertise our presence to aliens, who probably wouldn't notice the planet earth, or the powerful radio waves emanating from all over it, but would notice this little probe in a similiar orbit to earth. I am going to write to Congress to have this ill-thought-out mission removed before we all die :'( Buckethed (talk) 08:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

aerogel

Hopiakuta 02:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Findings?

A section with a concise summary of the most important findings would be nice. -- 92.229.179.88 (talk) 23:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NEAR Shoemaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041030135425/http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/tmp/1996-008A.html to http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/tmp/1996-008A.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Questions to address

• Was it communicating by high gain antenna during the descent ?
• Was there also a low gain antenna ?
• after impact how was the orientation on the surface measured ?
  • (apparently it ended up resting on two of the 4 solar panels)
• How did NASA communicate after impact (which probably misaligned the HG antenna, and Eros rotating) ?
• Was the multispectral imager the camera used for the final images during descent ? (yes)
• What was the timeline after impact, eg to get the on-surface x-ray/gamma-ray readings ? (14 days?)
• why didn't NASA retrieve the rest of the final image ?
• where on Eros did it land (Eros rotates in 5.27 hrs)

- Rod57 (talk) 11:29, 20 May 2018 (UTC)