Talk:Nagarakretagama

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Manipulation of history[edit]

Dear users,

Can we write history without manipulation? I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also Kidung Sunda article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda.

Best regards, --Serayu 04:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC) (the lover of true history without manipulation)

Citations[edit]

The citations on this page are very difficult to follow. For instance the ref to Stutterheim: Acta Orientalia of 1938. There appear to be several different acta. The one in question here is probably Acta Orientalia Neerlandica but it's hard to tell because it's not online. In addition, I don't know if it's a typo, but that word Saktavism is completely unknown on the internet. I presume it's connected with the Saka people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.77.135 (talk) 13:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]