Talk:Nanticoke Generating Station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Canada / Ontario (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
 
WikiProject Energy (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Suggested first objectives[edit]

I would like to extend the history section further as the highest priority now. A first target for this article would be to have as much(or more) informationu as is given for the similar (now decomissioned) plant of Lakeview_Generating_Station.

The decomissioning of the Nanticoke plant is of high political and environmental significance for the region and this article(and similar) deserves attention. Sources of information regarding the impact of energy supply to the region as well as the environmental impact will need to be found to extend the article further. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanserfaust (talkcontribs) 21:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Point of View[edit]

The Environmental Impact section uses the terms "gigantic", "choking" and "devastating", which don't represent a neutral point of view (although it may be true). I think the section can do without those words. Also consider removing the colloquialism "a major plank...". Under "Decommissioning Plans", the statement "Closure of the plant at that date however, seems rather unlikely as viable energy options for the growing Ontario economy are becoming scarce." is an opinion - not a factual statement and should probably be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.200.234 (talk) 11:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)