Talk:Nanticoke Generating Station

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Nanticoke Generating Station was copied or moved into Nanticoke Solar Facility with this edit on 13 August 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Suggested first objectives[edit]

I would like to extend the history section further as the highest priority now. A first target for this article would be to have as much(or more) informationu as is given for the similar (now decomissioned) plant of Lakeview_Generating_Station.

The decomissioning of the Nanticoke plant is of high political and environmental significance for the region and this article(and similar) deserves attention. Sources of information regarding the impact of energy supply to the region as well as the environmental impact will need to be found to extend the article further. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanserfaust (talk • contribs) 21:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Point of View[edit]

The Environmental Impact section uses the terms "gigantic", "choking" and "devastating", which don't represent a neutral point of view (although it may be true). I think the section can do without those words. Also consider removing the colloquialism "a major plank...". Under "Decommissioning Plans", the statement "Closure of the plant at that date however, seems rather unlikely as viable energy options for the growing Ontario economy are becoming scarce." is an opinion - not a factual statement and should probably be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.200.234 (talk) 11:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More information[edit]

This article just talks about the production of power and CO2 and the environmental impact. It should be considered a stub article since it does not contain any history or other information outside of how it was shut down to lower canada's CO2 production levels. How big was it in Square feet (or meters)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.26.89.87 (talk) 17:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nanticoke Generating Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]