This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The tone of this article seems hostile to islam. The last paragraph is an example. Also, the underestimation of the Egyptian courts and legal system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk • contribs) 04:27, December 15 2006
He is a critic of Islamism and of sclerotic theology. I think it is very much an oversimplification to call him a critic of Islam. He is not, as far as I can recall from the one lecture of his I attended, a critic of Islam as such. I have only seen that list for the first time today thanks to your remarks, and I would have some concerns about it as well. Palmiro | Talk 03:32, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
The listing of violation of human rights is very POV. You don't find people listing human rights violation when it comes to other controversial issues and authors. I have removed them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 22:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
If he was judged to be a murtad, then he was judged to be an apostate. A heretic is known as a zindiq (heresy=zandaqa). Apostacy and heresy are different concepts. I think the text should be amended to read 'apostate' instead of 'heretic.'لقمانLuqman 00:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
According to the text, he is a murtad! For instance because he rejected the Quranic statement that men are superior to women [النساء : 4/33]. Or maybe the author of that passage who is claiming false information about the believe of the modern ulamâ, by writing in the "Humanistic Hermeneutics of the Islam":
The classical position of the modern ulamâ about that issue is understandable as "they still believe in superiority of the male in the family". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk • contribs) 03:11, December 26, 2006