Talk:Natural resource extraction
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Disputing facts[edit]
Anyone dispute the factuality of any of this? Anyone? The tag is there, but nobody has anything to say? Maxxam Palco Louisiana-Pacific Headwaters Grove? Hmmm. Any lumber company representatives want to say what's wrong or inaccurate here? Ok. I'm taking that disputed neutrality tag off if there's no response by, say, Christmas?Pedant 21:29, 2004 Nov 8 (UTC)
- this page is a complete crock of greenie leftist envirowank. It is so far off neutral it' in top gear.Rolinator 01:51, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
As the page was simply a semi-coherent, unsourced POV rant - I've redirected it to mining. Vsmith 12:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Reverted[edit]
Page had worthwhile text, removing this and redirecting to mining is inappropriate. Mining is a subtopic. Similar to redirecting Retail to Toy store. 67.49.8.228 (talk) 21:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Did have worthwhile text, but wasn't in a worthwhile form. Rephrased, extensively edited. Ought to be far more NPOV now. --Tiggythegreat (talk) 15:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)