Natural resources of India was nominated as a good article in the Natural sciences category but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Hello, I'll take this review if there are no more objections. I'll start by noting I haven't had any involvement in creating or editing this article. LT90001 (talk) 02:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to note at the outset that there have been two previous reviews and that this has been renominated straight away. Although the reviews were cursory in nature, there are some grammatical concerns that impact on readability that do need to be addressed. However, it's clear there has been a lot of work on this article. I'll note some concerns and then after they have been addressed continue the review:
Unless a word is a proper noun, it doesn't need to be capitalised in the middle of a sentence. This happens all over the place and was noted in GA1.
I hope this helps. I will continue the review when these have been addressed. Kind regards, LT90001 (talk) 02:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
With no response in 12 days and no significant contributions by the nominator since August 22, I've closed this review. I encourage nomination when and only when the above criteria have been dealt with. This article has been refused nomination three times, and some issues must be dealt with if it is to be promoted. LT910001 (talk) 09:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)