This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Nature Communications is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
Your latest version is still wrong. For 2010-2015, the journal is not entirely open access. The 'about' section of their homepage (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/about/index.html) says "so the journal will continue to publish subscription content throughout 2015". "Subscription contents" means the exact opposite of "open access". -- Regards, Oisguad (talk) 15:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for taking my note into consideration, but sorry: it's still wrong. It's not an open access journal, because some contents is not open access. Even in a couple of years from now, when all **new** contents will be open source, the journal as a whole, meaning the entire corpus of hitherto published works, should not be said to be "open access" without making a reservation about the early volumes. -- Oisguad (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Clearly not an open access journal in 2015. --126.96.36.199 (talk) 19:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)