Talk:Navman

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

This reads very much like an advertisement to me. --85.210.25.6 14:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! I will try to clean it up, add more information and remove the adverts. Aero Flame 21:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleared up the article, removed the adverts, and added some more information. I will try to add some more. Aero Flame 21:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, this is still an advertisment. It doesnt even touch on any of the extremely well publicised history such as the mismanagement by Brunswick that caused most of the senior management to resign.

This reads like a very poor advert. Needs serious editing.

If Plodderman (who is obviously a Navman employee) does any more "editing" he should be banned. 125.238.33.225 21:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get much advertising feel from this, but it's certainly a very poorly upkept entry. I don't know if it's worth mentioning the high failure rates of the S series s30-s90i models, but as a sales ass., it was certainly a trying time. --119.11.30.159 (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup/update[edit]

I've started to do a bit of a cleanup and update of the page. Should this article be about the original Navman entities (so include info on Navman Wireless and Navman Marine) or reflect the current usage of the "Navman" name (ie: PNDs, with Navman Marine and Navman Wireless split off into new articles)?

Feel free to fill in the gaps, especially in cleaning up the "previous devices" section. My main source of info has been the Navman site, so is somewhat lacking when it comes to the older, discontinued, units. AntiStatic (talk) 07:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Navman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]