Talk:Neighborhoods in Washington, D.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Proposed Sections History, description,Education, Worship, Transportation. references, and External links sections.

There should be a Neighborhood infobox, with things like what? population?, Ward, council/school board.

Also the Geo-links template is good and should show up somehow.

Perhaps there is some way to also add a neighboring neighborhood template or something. --Jvv62 03:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neighborhoods map[edit]

The neighborhoods on the map I've uploaded doesn't match this list perfectly (because I did not make it for this specific purpose). If anyone would like to edit the map, the svg is available on Wikitravel Shared. If anyone would like to give me some help with it, I'd be glad to make some revisions as needed—just leave me a message on my talk page. --Peter Talk 02:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upper Northwest[edit]

The term "Upper Northwest" does not apply exclusively to Ward 3. Portions of Ward 4 are also considered to be in the Upper Northwest. Removing the term from the next to Ward 3. Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 02:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting article?[edit]

This article needs to be split down to the Wards. Like Neighborhoods of New York City has been split down to the Boroughs. Mr Taz (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd disagree, and would like to see a positive argument in favor of such a split. My objections would be simply that D.C. is a far smaller city than NYC—the boroughs of the latter city are large enough to be considered separate cities—and that the article is not terribly long as it is. --Peter Talk 01:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also Template talk:Neighborhoods in Washington, D.C. Mr Taz (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

not a federal work[edit]

I've made this comment before on the DC Ward map page but the DC Ward map is a work of OCTO which is part of the DC govt, and which is *not* a federal agency. I doubt very much therefore it is public domain and we're probably breaching copyright Cphi (talk) 09:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All work created by the DC government is in the public domain, and may be used freely by anyone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.82.146.3 (talk) 20:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source for that? I don't think that's true. Best, epicAdam(talk) 20:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Adam is correct. See here and here. APK that's not my name 20:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Related category[edit]

I noticed Category:United States communities with African American majority populations has been added to > half of the D.C. neighborhood articles (57 out of 127, if I counted correctly). The category header says "This category includes articles about cities, towns, and other Census designated places in the United States which have African American majority populations." Washington, D.C. already includes the category, so I have a few questions: 1) Is it considered overlapping categories? 2) The header doesn't mention neighborhoods. Is that intentional? 3) What source is being used to determine whether or not a D.C. neighborhood's population is 50.01% African American? I thought it was common knowledge that some neighborhoods no longer have a black-majority population (Strivers' Section, Adams Morgan, West End, Capitol Hill), while others are harder to define because of gentrification (U Street Corridor, Columbia Heights, Logan Circle, Shaw, Mount Vernon, Southwest Waterfront). APK straight up now tell me 02:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would say for the purposes of such a category, only the city would be recognized. It doesn't make sense to list each neighborhood. Neighborhoods are local entities designated by he DC government, not the Census Bureau. Further, I do not know of any source that specifically details the ethnic composition of each D.C. neighborhood. Therefore, any users who add D.C. neighborhoods to the category are most likely using unsourced information or are calculating the data themselves in direct violation of WP:OR. Therefore, I would say that the category should be removed from neighborhood pages. Best, epicAdam(talk) 04:23, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More Ward information[edit]

I've just added ward maps (not the DC.gov ones, but user-created ones licensed under GNU), as well as the councilmembers for each wards. Since nearly every article with a mention of DC's wards links to this one, I'd think we'd want as much ward-specific info on this page as we can fit.

Thus whoever can do so should add as much other relevant info as possible: demographics, especially. Msclguru (talk) 21:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed Harry Thomas, Jr as the Ward 5 councilmember and replaced it with "vacant". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.100.13.66 (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Official Neighborhoods[edit]

Not only is the list of neighborhoods poorly defined, and downright inaccurate at times, there are also several official neighborhoods in the city as defined by either BID or CID standards. The area in NW DC bordered by 7th Street, New York Ave, New Jersey Ave, and Massachusetts Ave has been an official neighborhood, under the name of Mount Vernon Triangle, since 2004. This entire article needs to be redone with preference given to those neighborhoods that exist officially and other area names, like Chinatown, pushed to another section of historical or common use names. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJoeGreene (talkcontribs) 15:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Listing neighborhoods by ward is a useless exercise. For one, the article on the Advisory Neighborhood Commissions already divides the city by political boundaries. Neighborhoods also have broader definition and can be defined by a number of factors, least of which are wards that change every Census. I'm going to rename and reformat this article so that it is a larger discussion about D.C. neighborhoods and their development. Best, epicAdam(talk) 16:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I added Mount Vernon Triangle and will work on writing an article for it soon. (unless someone else beats me to it) There's ample evidence of it being considered a separate neighborhood. APK whisper in my ear 00:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]