Talk:Nest of Angels

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Nest of Angels has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 15, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: Episode coverage / Spooks Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Spooks task force.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nest of Angels/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 16:46, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it is necessary to cite the title in an article about the title. We're using the episode itself as a reference for that. Also, if you must keep Ref. 1, fix the parenthesis in the parenthesis. It looks funny.
Intro: "Brenton and the producers made the episode with much research to provide a balanced view towards Islam, as well as the nature of the plot" -> "Brenton and the producers researched elements of Islam in order to o provide a balanced view towards the religion, as well as the nature of the plot"
Intro: Comma needed after "however"
Plot: I'm not sure, but I think "west" should be capitalized in the plot section.
Plot: disired -> desired
Plot: "Tom is okay" Maybe a bit too colloquial. How about "Tom is unharmed".
Writing: "after the audience watch the episode" should be either "after the audience watched the episode" or "after the audience would watch the episode"
Writing: "He included characters who were innocent Muslims who oppose the extremists from their religion, and a "Muslim hero" to thwart the terrorists." -> "He included characters, such as innocent Muslims who opposed the Islamic extremists, as well as a "Muslim hero" who would thwart the terrorists."
Writing: "The ending was written to be melancholic, a conclusion that there were no winners." -> "The ending was written to be melancholic, in which there were no winners."
Casting: "The episode included a guest appearance from Alexander Siddig, who was well known as playing regular character Julian Bashir in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, played the "Muslim hero" Muhammed Ibhn Khaldun." -> "The episode included a guest appearance from Alexander Siddig, who played the "Muslim hero" Muhammed Ibhn Khaldun. Siddig was already well known as playing regular character Julian Bashir in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine."
Casting: "The producers thought Siddig as a "noble" actor when playing the character." -> "The producers thought of Siddig as a "noble" actor when he was playing his character."
Casting: "It also sees" -> "The episode also marks"
Filming: "The episode was directed Bharat Nalluri, he" Either put a semi-colon instead of the comma after Nalluri, or add 'and' in there
Controversy: "members of the broadcasters believed that viewers realises" -> "members of the broadcasters believed that viewers realised"
Controvery: "drama about this - it is topical" & "suicide bombers inside - kill the bombers" Change the dash to an en-dash (–)
Are there any critical reviews? Usually, those are important for an episode article.

I'm afraid not. However, the extent of the controversy the show attracted more or less warrants the article's notability. -- Matthew RD 16:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References: You use parenthesis inside parenthesis quite a bit. It's OK just to say "Spooks Series 2"
References: Every appearance of the show should be italicized

That's all. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've addressed the above issues, hope this helps. Thanks for the review. -- Matthew RD 16:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I will pass. Congrats!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 05:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nest of Angels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322030752/http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/paper/index.php?article=1222 to http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/paper/index.php?article=1222

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions