|↓||Skip to table of contents||↓|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Net neutrality article.|
|Archives: 1, 2|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Michigan State University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the Spring 2011 term. Further details are available on the course page.|
|To-do list for Net neutrality:|
|This article has been mentioned or used by a media organization. The reference is in:
"Law elsewhere in the world" - Korea
In Korea, blocking VoIP is not a hot issue anymore. As smartphone users are increasing, mobile carriers try to block mobile VoIP services. It is a very controversial emerging issue between 3G mobile carriers and service providers now. Also, this is a major concern on enacting Network Neutrality regulations in Korea. --JungIn (talk) 06:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Hands Off The Internet site outdated
So, I was looking under the Opposition heading, and saw that an organization, "Hands Off the Internet," had been set up to oppose net neutrality. However, their site, www.handsoff.org, no longer appears to be under their ownership, and is now a German page for general, unrelated topics. Should we add a note about this or remove the link? Unless "handsoff" is German for something, I have the feeling that whoever now owns the site expects to capitalize off the traffic.
^ European Commission (13 November 2007). "Impact Assessment on the proposals to amend the European regulatory framework (Working Document)" (PDF). pp. 91. Retrieved 26 December 2008.
This is currently citation #75 and it contains an invalid reference that only opens a GIF image.
Article needs a re-write; the entire summary/opening paragraphs are incredibly bias - the pro net neutrality position is put forth just fine, but the arguments against net neutrality are almost straw-men arguments. The arguments are put up, then immediately refuted, with debateable evidence. This is not the way to write a non-biased article; one side can't be unrefuted, while the other is pummeled, especially not before the reader has ever gotten past the first two paragraphs 22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Bad WOT Ratings?
A few of the resources have bad Web of Trust ratings. Should these be removed, in the interest increasing article-quality? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweyn78 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
2014 court ruling in federal appeals court
Headline: "Court Rejects Rules on Net Neutrality"
-  and "Court Tosses FCC's 'Net Neutrality' Rules"
"A federal appeals court opened the way for broadband providers to charge content companies for faster speeds, striking down federal rules that had required equal treatment of Internet traffic." 31 min ago — FYI, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Subtle trolling or just bad style?
The "Mixed and other views" section has 10 instances of the word "applications" in a single paragraph, and my display puts "applications" as the first word in 5 successive lines. i.imgur.com/6Ve2Pzl.png It's sort of distracting. Forbes72 (talk) 04:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)