|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the New Horizons article.|
|Archives: Index, 1|
|WikiProject Spaceflight||(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)|
|WikiProject Solar System||(Rated B-class, High-importance)|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any threads with no replies in 3 months may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
New Horizons mission to the Planet Pluto
I believe if you will check, you will find that NASA has NO official position on whether Pluto is a Planet or an Dwarf Planet and as such, I think the first sentence should read, Planet Pluto not Dwarf Planet. There maybe individual Scientist who work at NASA (But not paid by NASA) who support the View on Dwarf Worlds however. Magnum Serpentine (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- That is irrelevant as it is not for national body like NASA to decide. The International Astronomical Union is the only authority which decides astronomical nomenclature. The IAU defined Pluto as a Dwarf Planet. ChiZeroOne (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- 'Dwarf planet' is correct of course. However, in the context of the sentence "launched by NASA on 19 January 2006 to study the dwarf planet Pluto" it is slightly misleading, I think. Pluto was not officially a dwarf planet (it was still considered a planet) at the time of launch. So, at its inception (and even at launch) New Horizons was a mission to study the only remaining unexplored 'planet'.18.104.22.168 (talk) 11:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
VNH0004, not VNH2004
"Jan 2015 Observation of KBO VNH2004"
It is VNH0004, not VNH2004.
- Fixed! RazorEye ⡭ ₪ ·o' ⍦ ࿂ 13:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/sbag/meetings/jan2014/presentations/08_1615_Weaver_NH_Status_SBAG.pdf --Craigboy (talk) 07:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Re "Search for additional moons, and any rings".
One of the stated tertiary objects is to look for rings. Does anyone know where this comes from? Is there any stated record of this being a goal? Is there any reason to believe any of these bodies could have rings? 22.214.171.124 (talk) 11:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Pluto has several small moons. Around Saturn, several of the small moons create rings because they do not have sufficient gravity to hold onto material after micro-impacts. This may be happening with Pluto, too. JavautilRandom (talk) 17:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
"Key mission dates" section
If the community agrees, I would propose deleting the "Key mission dates" section from the article. The table itself looks misplaced in the article and a number of dates are unreferenced. Other than that, all of the mentioned dates and events are already mentioned in the appropriate sections of the article, with the most important ones in the lead section, so the table basically duplicates them for no reason. Regarding future mission milestones, they too are clearly stated in the "Kuiper-belt mission" and "Pluto flyby". I personally dislike going too detalied about future missions because they are clearly still being planned and the exact mission for New Horizons after the Pluto encounter is still unclear. Can I get some opinions on this? :-)--Saxum (talk) 17:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)