Talk:New Jersey Route 92/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox[edit]
- No issues
Lead[edit]
- No issues
History[edit]
- No issues
Proposed alignments[edit]
- Fix disambiguation issue with "East Windsor" according to this
Proposed interchanges[edit]
- Source needed to verify information in "Route 92 (Princeton-Hightstown)" subsection
References[edit]
- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address other issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- That shouldn't have been there period, someone added it. Fixed the other problems. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 20:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)