Talk:New Jerusalem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Religion / Interfaith  (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Interfaith work group.
 
WikiProject Christianity / Theology / Latter Day Saints / Witnesses (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by theology work group.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Judaism (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Michell diagram[edit]

New Jerusalem (Michell) Sacred Geometry.svg

Here's the "New Jerusalem" geometric diagram of author John Michell, which has achieved some moderate degree of fame among "sacred geometry" enthusiasts. Probably won't make it into the article, but thought I'd throw it here for comment, if anyone is interested... AnonMoos (talk) 00:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems to smack of astrological derivation, which could be an encrypted reference set of the John work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.51.73.66 (talk) 03:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Not sure that astrology is too relevant; the diagram was partly based on astronomy, partly on the isopsephy of ancient Greek words, partly on supposed ancient units of measurement, and partly on abstract geometry... AnonMoos (talk) 08:07, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Well then have a look at the diagram(s) at Horoscope, plus if you move back to Kepler, you will find that modern Astronomy derives in large measure from needs and uses of Astrology. 69.69.19.94 (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Yoga[edit]

The twelve Chakra systems, which include the standard seven plus five additional centers (one above the head, plus two at hands and two at feet) could be a clue to the "gates" spoken of at this celestial city, thus freeing New Jerusalem from geography, but not personal location. 69.69.17.194 (talk) 22:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a blog for your personal exegesis. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Nor is it a post board for conspicuously ignorant evaluations. (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.69.20.198 (talk) 22:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Wow, those Scientology Word Clearing courses you've asked me to take sure must be something if they allow you to not have the guidelines apply to you by not reading them the same way other speakers of the English language do. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Yes, try them some time when you have matured. (69.69.17.120 (talk) 18:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC))
Well, obviously, the Church of Scientology's treatment of Lisa McPherson was mature. As was Operation Snow White. There's a website, theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com/ which really shows how amazing the Church of Scientology really is. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps their botched treatments of her were only slightly less erroneous than some of your toxic & gnostic opinions; now there's a website which speaks about POV and editorial, personally negative opinions, within Wikipedia? 71.48.255.230 (talk) 01:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


order of paragraphs[edit]

It seems the order of the paragraphs can use some re-structuring, namely the Ezekiel detail of the city placed first.. any ideas?--חודר לעומר (talk) 21:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


Intro names[edit]

Can we limit the "also know as" intro names to three at most?--חודר לעומר (talk) 21:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)