Talk:Nexus 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The specs listed on this page seem to differ from Google's website (http://www.google.com/nexus/9/). What are your sources for the following individual specifications: proximity sensor, digital compass, barometer, and micro-HDMI port? --61.62.109.22 (talk) 01:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Guest[reply]

I updated the specs to reflect those listed on the website. Thanks for catching that. -heat_fan1 (talk) 13:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 June 2015[edit]

Well I actually wanted to just add that the nexus 9 is actually clocked at 2.5Ghz and not 2.3Ghz considering benchmark tests and tablet specs apps like Cpu-Z says its clocked at 2.5Ghz 107.145.234.212 (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Amortias (T)(C) 21:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Need to rename this to Nexus 9 (2014)[edit]

Am trying to create a disambiguation page with the Nexus-9 replicant from the Blade Runner 2049 film. Need to move this title to Nexus 9 (2014), which is a similar format to other Nexus articles (e.g. Nexus (2007)). Any objectors? thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)  Done Britishfinance (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Britishfinance: Waiting 90 minutes is definitely not standard. There is a primary topic and this should not have been moved, it could have been done with a hatnote. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 15:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Galatz: Once I realized that other Google Nexus models had been named in this way (and a dis page created with them to accommodate other Blade Runner characters), I realized that this was a straightforward edit. However, for good measure, I also fixed the other existing links to the Google Nexus 9 product on the template pages to send them directly to the moved page. Britishfinance (talk) 16:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Britishfinance: You are not comparing apples to oranges though. I assume you are referring to Nexus 7 which had two equally as notable devices. In this instance there is a clear primary topic. The one you are disambiguating does not even have its own page, so clearly not a primary topic. Therefore per WP:2DAB it should not have been moved and a hatnote should have been used. In addition, you used incorrect disambiguation, because 2014 is not disambiguating it from the character you are referring to. The year was used for Nexus 7 because they were released in different years, when there is only one, it should have probably been Nexus 9 (tablet) if it needed anything. But as I said, it should not have been moved and a hatnote should have been used. I have requested this be undone. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 16:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]