Talk:Nineteen Minutes

Novels: Crime Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Crime task force.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australian edition[edit]

I added an infobox to the page, however all of the details - including the cover, publisher, number of pages and possibly ISBN (not sure) - are based on the Australian Allen & Unwin edition. Since the book is American, I was wondering whether someone might be able to re-fill in the details from the American edition? Thanks. 97198 ^talk•_contribs 07:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could edit the information, as I have the information, but I do not know the approach that I should take when editing this. Should I add the information for the US version above the austrailian version, or start the infobox over and just contain the US version information? Anarchy 228 (talk) 14:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Literary Significance and Criticism?[edit]

This is a misnomer. If anything the book is insignificant. Neither is it "Literary"; Picoult does not write Literature. The section title needs to be changed. "Reception" is a much more appropriate term.-FM (talk) 19:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)-FM (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)FM[reply]

Confusing opening[edit]

I'm confused -- "It was her first book to debut at #1 on the New York Times Best Seller list." Has she had a second (third, fourth...) book to debut in that spot? Already? Or is that just a clumsy way to say "It debuted at #1 etc" ? Or is it simply extreme, and npov, optimism?

"It was her first book to debut at #1 on the New York Times Best Seller list." is a fact. No more or less. I don't know when this was asked, but as yet there is at least a second book to debut at #1: Handle with care (2009). Change of Heart (2008) also reached #1, but I'm not sure if it was the debut or not. A black eyed (talk) 14:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

something missing[edit]

"Reception

In the wake of the Virginia Tech massacre, Picoult made a statement on her website, concerning the shooting:"

And it ends there. What statement? And what does her statement have to do with the novel's reception? And what court place does Peter's trials take place?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.62.47 (talk) 04:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find the original statement from Jodi's website, but I did find a website quoting the statement that she posted on her website.

From: http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/printed-books/nineteen-minutes-jodi-picoult/1136794/

In wake of the shooting, Jodi Picoult released this statement on her website.

"As a parent, my deepest sympathy goes out to the victims and families of the Virginia Tech community. Although shootings on college campuses are often motivated by different factors than the ones I researched for high school shootings in Nineteen Minutes, any time something like this happens it is tragic and raises questions. However, the one we should be asking right now is: How can we help this community heal?"

Anarchy 228 (talk) 14:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]