Talk:Nintendo DS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article Nintendo DS was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
WikiProject Video games (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.
 

DS lite specifications[edit]

I believe the DS lite specifications section should be reviewed. Firstly, I found that some part of it was confused with the specs of the DSi (CPU). There may be more. Also, it seems that apart from size, battery life and weight, they are the same with respect to hardware. Maybe it should be considered to change the section to something like "The Nintendo DS lite has the same hardware specifications as the original Nintendo DS with the exceptions of..." Would do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.156.126.106 (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Model comparison[edit]

Nintendo 3DS needs to be added to the model comparison. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quadrplax (talkcontribs) 02:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

The 3DS does not need to be added, as it is not a DS. This would be equivalent (for example) of showing the PS3 in a comparison table of PS2 models. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 05:44, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
It's within the same series. I think it needs to be added to the comparison. Just because it supports 3d and a whole bunch of other features does not make it not part of the series. It takes the same game cartages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.5.200 (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, and launch PS3s could play PS2 games, while all PS2s and PS3s can play PS1 games; that does not make them variants of the same console. Similarly, the GBA could play Gameboy and GBC games, but wasn't simply a "type of Gameboy". The 3DS is the successor to the DS/DSi. It has very different hardware and 3DS games are not compatible with the original DSes/DSis. It is in "the same series" as the DSes/DSis, but isn't a form of the same console (A good comparison would the the PlayStation article, which is about the series, so covers PS1, PS2, PS3, PSP and PSV. This article is equivalent to PlayStation (console), which is about the PS1.) Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 19:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
As a side note, technically this article isn't even about the DS in general, but about the original DS model. The DS Lite and DSi have their own articles. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Region Lock[edit]

At least on PAL Systems, one cannot play any American DS Games on the DSi, DSiXL or 3DS. They are still compatible with DS and DS Lite. The article is a little vague on this subject, opining that only DSi-enhanced software is region-locked. I don't know whether American or Japanese Systems feature a similar lock. Anyone know about that? Just a thought, Samjohn95 21:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Merger discussion[edit]

Another editor pointed me to an orphaned article on the launch of the Nintendo DS. Apparently it was AfD'd four years ago with the result being Keep. Instead of deleting it, this information should be incorporated into this main article, with the exact amount of content to be determined by consensus in this discussion. Again, the suggested article to be merged here is considered an orphan, since nothing links back to it, and its information would certainly not be out of place here. --McDoobAU93 15:53, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Support merge As noted above. --McDoobAU93 15:53, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support merge As per McDoob; (I am the editor who "pointed him" to the article.) Salvidrim (talk) 16:38, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support merge I am new to the edition of pages. What's the procedure to merge that article?--Darkeagle7x (talk) 05:59, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Support – It will definitely need trimmed down, but I don't see the need to keep it as a standalone article. Good catch, Salvidrim. --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose merge. There's quite a bit of information on the launch page and there are only two options for dealing with that content, neither of which I find appealing:
Cut out some content. It would be unfortunate to cut the list of launch titles for each region, for instance.
Keep all the content. Would make the main article very long.
CaseyPenk (talk) 23:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Has the DS outsold the PS2?[edit]

The PS2 article says that it sold 150 million units, less than the DS' nearly 154 million.75.63.51.171 (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

List_of_best-selling_game_consoles states 155 million, perhaps the PS2 article needs to be updated. Яehevkor 16:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Ah, the 150 figure was "as of January 31, 2011". Some time ago. Яehevkor 16:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Series[edit]

There should be an article about the DS line as a whole.--occono (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

DS does not stand for Developer's System[edit]

Sheesh, don't you understand that he was joking when he said that? It was a remark about how developer friendly it was, not a serious remark about what the initials DS were for. Someone please remove or at least clarify this76.226.197.184 (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

There's a source from the official site saying so in a FAQ. I don't see any sign that what is being said is a joke. TheStickMan[✆Talk] 22:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

“Dī Esu”?[edit]

Re this reversion, why are we romanizing an unwritten Japanese phoneticization of Roman letters? I find this very confusing. Unless the lead has the Japanese name wrong, t’s not the ディーエス; it’s the DS. As I understand it, we use Hepburn romanization on WP, and I can’t find anything about “romanizing” Roman text like “DS” either in our Hepburn article or in MOS:J#Romanization. Did I miss where it’s addressed? Or was this a community decision somewhere, and could someone point me to where it was made? Thanks. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 03:47, 8 July 2014 (UTC)