Talk:Nissan R90C

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

"R91CP" and "R92CP" are an original racing car developed by Nissan. There is no relevance and R90C. The following sources of information. Naoshi Kuroi (Takashi Kuroi). (1992). Le Mans - Race contestants great grass. Shueisha. ISBN 4087801586.

--Marionett in the mirror (talk) 08:14, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are developments of the R90CP. All R91CPs and R92CPs are built on chassis built in 1990 as R90CP. http://wsrp.ic.cz/chassis/chassis_nissan.html The359 (Talk) 08:29, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That description is not true.

The book was published in Japan that contains the participants heard from Nissan.--211.134.42.150 (talk) 08:59, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This does the fact that all R91CPs and R92CPs carry the same chassis numbers as R90CPs. Yes, Nissan carried out development work on the R91CP and R92CP. That doesn't mean they were brand new, scratch built race cars.
Here is R89C chassis #02, carrying on as "Nissan R91CP" in 1991. The359 (Talk) 09:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

::Is "chassis number" of the sentence that you wrote about a part called "R9xx"?--211.134.42.150 (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is the number attached to the physical chassis. R89C #02 started life as a Nissan R89C, became an R90CP, and then an R91CP. The359 (Talk) 09:22, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that data on the Internet is less credible. Correct to say this because I heard directly from more What is the relationship? Not clear or correct such information in the source can not say?--211.134.42.150 (talk) 09:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As your English is very poor, it seems clear to me that you are not understanding what your are editing or what is being told to you. The359 (Talk) 09:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at the official page of Nissan. http://www.nismo.co.jp/M_SPORTS/entertainment/DIRECTORY/vol_1.html --211.134.42.150 (talk) 09:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And see that it says that the car was developed in house with new aerodynamics added to the strengthened monocoque, which had been based on existing designs. Same car underneath, new bodywork and some other modifications and improvements. Exactly what I've said the entire time. The359 (Talk) 09:51, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]