Talk:Normative social influence
 | Normative social influence was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 14, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2013. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)/Psychology 220A (Fall, 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
This page was created for an extra credit assignment for school. Avalenti 05:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Making some additions to the page[edit]
 | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. |
Good info on this page! I'll just be adding some new sections and information to this page. Doing it as part of a class assignment. Thank you!Jblim23 (talk) 08:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- @User:Jblim23: Please add end of paragraph citations; a number of paragraphs is missing them. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Normative social influence/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Piotrus (talk · contribs) 13:44, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
I will review this, but first I want to see if the student(s) working on this is/are still active and will reply here. If there are editors who are going to work on this, please fix the indicated reference problem and WP:ECHO me. I'll provide a fuller review then. Otherwise this will be failed in a week due to problems with references (failure of WP:GA? 2b requirement). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Failed as the not-to-uncommon instructor and student waste of reviwers time. (Instructor asks student to submit a GA nom, class ends, reviewer spends time here, nobody cares as the class ended). Student laziness is usual and can be understood if not excused. Instructor's irresponsibility in wasting editors time, less so. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Redirect from social validation[edit]
I think the redirect from social validation was a slap-on. The article doesn't really address the topic directly at all, and on quick first impressions, doesn't even look like it really ought to.
Social validation—in at least one of its major guises—is not so much about conformity, as been seen and accepted for who you are. — MaxEnt
Missing citations[edit]
Missing citations- Although someone went through and pointed out the fact that citations are needed, no one has actually gone through and added the sources. So I would urge the fact for either the original author or someone familiar with the topic to add the needed citations.JO88888888 (talk) 02:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- JO88888888, see this edit--so that's one of them fixed (see Wikipedia:Be bold--part of the training). Also, your user name is illegible to anyone with older eyes: I cannot possibly tell how many eights there are in it. Very unfortunate. Drmies (talk) 03:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)