Talk:Nursing and Midwifery Council

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:NURSE priority review[edit]

As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to low per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale. I have also added stub class. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it. Cheers, Basie (talk) 05:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

I feel this page's importance needs re-appraisal, as does the stub class. I have updated the page to reflect recent high-profile media events. These also add to the historical context of this important UK organisation. Referencing has been improved, and some remedial formatting issues dealt with. There is further scope here for much valuable work, i.e. see GMC wiki for comparison. En-Sea (talk) 18:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed changes to the page[edit]

The communications team at the NMC is proposing the following changes to the page. These explain the revised Code and revalidation. They replace the current sections on setting standards and revalidation:

Setting standards

The NMC’s revised code became effective on 31 March 2015. The code contains professional standards of practice and behaviour that all nurses and midwives must keep to.

Four key sections describe what nurses and midwives are expected to do:

• prioritise people • practise effectively • preserve safety, and • promote professionalism and trust.

The Code was updated to reflect changes in healthcare and society since its last publication in 2008. The updates include new requirements on the fundamentals of care, the duty of candour, raising concerns and social media use.

The introduction to the code states: “When joining our register, and then renewing their registration, nurses and midwives commit to upholding these standards. This commitment to professional standards is fundamental to being part of a profession. We can take action if registered nurses or midwives fail to uphold the Code. In serious cases, this can include removing them from the register. The Code should be useful for everyone who cares about good nursing and midwifery.”

Revalidation

The NMC has committed to developing and implementing a system of revalidation.

Nurses and midwives will need to renew their registration every three years. They will need to confirm that they:

• continue to remain fit to practise by meeting the principles of the revised Code • have completed the required hours of practice and learning activity through continuing professional development • have used feedback to review and improve the way they work, and • have received confirmation from someone well placed to comment on their continuing fitness to practise.

The NMC ran a public consultation on how revalidation can be applied in practice from January to March 2014. Pilots involving over 2,000 nurses and midwives across the UK will inform the final plans. Revalidation for nurses and midwives will start from late 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.68.72.158 (talk) 13:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nursing and Midwifery Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nursing and Midwifery Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nursing and Midwifery Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]